Phoney War in Afghanistan only a prelude to what's really coming down

DO read this one!

SPECIAL WEEKEND EDITION

The many news events of this weekend are all over-shadowed by the

attack by the U.S. military on Afghanistan. But this story is actually

anti-climactic and a mis-direction. The real story was released last Thursday

by U.S. National Security Advisor, Condoleeza Rice when she announced that as

a result of the Sept 11 attack on the World Trade Center, Russia has become

"the first and most active" partner of the United States.

The importance of Rice's statement was missed by all the other

news services who merely reported it without comment, or never reported it at

all. They never understood what it meant. Also in the last week many BroJon

readers wrote to ask, "Didn't you misspell the word "phoney" in the article

"DISMANTLING OF AMERICA - The Phoney War in Afghanistan?" The answer to that

question and the question of the importance of Rice's statement are both

answered together in the next upcoming article, "THE WORLD IN CHECKMATE - The

Phoney War in Afghanistan (Part 2)"

Just for BROJON DAILY DIGEST READERS here is a quick preview peek

at a portion of "The World in Checkmate" which answers both questions.

... It is a reference to the "Phoney War" which occurred in

southern France in 1939. While Hitler was invading Poland in the east, the

British and the French were lulled into taking no action. The Germans had

just invaded the mountainous Alsace Lorraine region on the border with France

in a region unprotected by the massive, World War I inspired, Maginot Line

wall fortress which ran all along the border between Germany and France,

except in the rugged mountains at the very southern end.

The German soldiers in the Alsace Lorraine would take occasional

pot shots across the border at the French, and the French simply returned the

fire. There were no casualties in this "war." The "phoney war" went on for

months from September 1939 to May 1940, while the world's news headlines

screamed of the invasion of Poland in the east. The French and British were

fooled into thinking Germany was no threat to the western countries. Then

suddenly, while nobody seems to have been looking, the vast German tank

armies burst through the Arden Forest around the top of the Maginot line

where it ends at Belgium, and within just two weeks took over almost all of

western Europe.

Thus the occasional pot shot action by the Germans in the Alsace

Lorraine was called the "Phoney War," using the British spelling. Obviously

the Germans were creating a misdirection and a hoax at the southern end of

the Maginot Line while in fact they were massing a huge army, the largest

invasion force then ever conceived, at the northern end in the Ruhr Valley

next to Belgium.

By the subtitle "The Phoney War in Afghanistan" I am referring to

the similarity with the misdirection and hoax played by the Germans at the

beginning of WWII. It is clear the same game is being played now. With the

massing of the fleets and planes in the Mediterranean Sea, Persian Gulf, and

Indian Ocean, all aimed at burnoosed Muslims in caves in the rugged mountains

of Afghanistan, the American media, along with President Bush are

misdirecting the public from the real world events now occurring ......

And what are those events which are being covered up by the

screaming headlines about the U.S. military attack on Afghanistan?

The visits just before the Afghan attacks, by Britain's PM Blair

and US Secretary of State, Powell to Russia to form a "new alliance" against

terror, and the visits by Defense Secretary, Rumsfeld to the many minor

middle east Muslim states indicates a major shift is occurring right now in

world power and alliances. Bush's call to all the world's nations two weeks

ago of, "Either you are with us or with the terrorists," is a code for either

you are with the US or with the Chinese. The new power division in the world

will no longer be East vs West, implying U.S. vs USSR, but is now the U.S.

and Russia combined vs China.

Many of the small middle eastern states and the many old soviet

Asian republics (the xx-ikistans) which are on the line of choosing between

alliance with the US or with China are being forced to decide in the next

week or so. The purpose for moving all the aircraft carriers, planes and

soldiers to the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean is to be in

place while US ambassadors question all the leaders of those smaller states,

"So are you with us or with the terrorists?" And all the while, half the US

military, 5 carrier war groups, fleets of B-52s, squadrons of fighters,

cruise missiles and masses of soldiers, along with fusillades of 18 inch

naval destroyer guns are all aimed down their throats. How do you think the

leaders of those countries are going to answer? Especially, while all around

them bombs are falling in Afghanistan.

And now you know the reason for such a massive military force

buildup surrounding the middle east, using smoke and mirrors to fool the

public into thinking they are going to shoot up some caves in Afghanistan.

What is going on right now is a major realignment of all the alliances of the

whole world, not anything to do with chasing burnoosed arabs in the desert.

And what is the name of this new alignment of world powers? It

was announced publicly by President George Bush, about 19 times in his

speeches way back in 1989 and 1990. It is the "New World Order." Most

conspiracy theorists have mistakenly assumed the term New World Order means

the establishment of a new One World power elite. Not so! The one world power

elite has already long been established, going back to the late 1930's. That

is the "Empire of Energy."

No, the term "New World Order" does not refer to any group or

power elite in the world, but instead refers to a new ordering or alignment

of world alliances. All during the Cold War from 1950 to 1991 the world was

aligned into East vs. West, or USSR vs the U.S. All other countries were

forced to choose alliance with either East or West.

The establishment of the "New World Order" is a new set of

alliances based on North vs. South, or Russia with the United States combined

as a Northern Alliance against the Southern countries lead by China. The key

to understanding the New World Order is that the coming new world economy is

no longer based on gold or oil, but based on the ownership of the nuclear

fuel, Plutonium, refined from Uranium ore.

In 1991 the world was in transition to the new economy. This

meant the combining of the old USSR and America as a new union based on their

ownership of the only stockpiles of plutonium. Neither China nor any other

country has their own raw supply of nuclear fuel. The purpose of the Cold War

was the scooping up of all the world's Uranium sources, under the guise of

Cold War national security.

For the USSR the New World Order meant the dissolution of the

Soviet Union in 1991. For the U.S. it means the reaction of the populace to

the attack on the World Trade Center, and announcing to the shocked and

easily fooled public, the formation of a new alliance with Russia, supposedly

against terrorism in 2001. In 1989, I had predicted in numerous articles and

radio interviews that the USSR and the U.S. would soon combine as a new union

against China. Very few people believed me then. With Condoleeza Rice's

statement showing a new realignment with Russia, this combination of the old

USSR and the U.S. into an expanded NATO or Northern Hemisphere Alliance is a

fait accompli.

This New World Order is based on the transition from a world

economy based on oil, "black gold," to a new world economy based on

Plutonium, "hot gold." And thus the reason for the title of the book, BLACK

GOLD HOT GOLD. The book is the documentary story of the wars leading to the

establishment of the old world order based on oil in the 20th century, and

the transition to the coming new world order based on Plutonium in the 21st

century. Understanding of the past allows for easy vision of the future.