Red Mercury Fusion Bomb - 2 softballs worth equals a 2 megaton explosion eliminating anything within 13 miles.
If 911 was the "wake up call" that
"changed the world"; the sheeple
won't have a clue on how to react to this...
Source:
Financial Sense Online
http://www.financialsense.com/
"The Balance of Terror and the Red Mercury Nightmare"
http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/analysis.htm
by J. R. Nyquist
March 26, 2002
On Thursday, March 21, WorldNetDaily posted an article from
STRATFOR, a well-connected private intelligence firm. The title of the
article was "Crisis looming between U.S., Russia."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26920
STRATFOR's article deals with CIA Director George Tenet's March 19 testimony
before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.
According to Tenet, Russia is hardly a reliable partner in the "war against
terror." Instead, Russia is "the first choice of proliferant states
seeking the most advanced technology and training," said Tenet.
What the CIA director could not say, and perhaps what makes
President George W. Bush so desperately eager to wipe out the regime of
Saddam Hussein, is that Russia may have given red mercury fusion technology to
Saddam. According to one of my sources, Iraq possesses "s-
megaton" micro-nuclear warheads. These are softball-sized two-megaton
fusion bombs triggered by an irradiated and compressed compound of mercury
antimony oxide. This device doubles the nuclear yield with a
hundredfold reduction of weight. Using heavy hydrogen instead of
uranium or plutonium to fuel its explosive reaction, this hand-held
nuclear weapon cannot be detected by U.S. sensors.
It should be acknowledged that CIA Director Tenet singled out Russia for a
reason. Only Russia has compression technology in advance of America's.
Only Russia has worked long and hard to develop a perfect fusion bomb (the U.S.
having abandoned its own effort decades ago).
And now American intelligence has evidence of something dire,
something they don't want to tell us. According to STRATFOR, "A
severe crisis between the two sides [America and Russia] may now be
forming." As STRATFOR further points out, "Now the director of the CIA
has named Russia as the key source of WMD proliferation."
Perhaps we are now in a position to understand what Mullah Omar,
the Taliban leader, meant when he said last fall that America would soon be
destroyed. He did not say America would be crippled, or that America would
be defeated. He said America would disappear.
When a suspect in the Danny Pearl kidnapping and murder case was being escorted
by guards in Pakistan a couple of weeks ago, he reportedly shouted to the press,
"Sell your dollars! Soon America will be gone."
What does Al Qaeda know that we don't?
CIA Director Tenet was very clear when he spoke to the U.S. Senate
committee last week. He holds Russia responsible for giving advanced mass
destruction technology to Iraq. And Tenet evidently believes that Iraq is
allied to Al Qaeda. As STRATFOR explained, "Tenet delivered a blunt
message to Putin: The United States believes that WMD proliferation is official
Russian policy." The Bush administration was offering a stern warning to
Moscow. It must halt its technology transfers to rogue regimes or suffer
the consequences. And what would those consequences be? STRATFOR claims
that President Putin "faces the
distinct possibility of attacks on Russian weapons facilities and the
potential elimination of his country's nuclear capability."
This statement deserves further elaboration. But who dares to
elaborate? Is America actually contemplating a nuclear strike on the
Russian nuclear arsenal? Only a very desperate crisis would trigger such
unthinkable verbiage out of our bloodless bean counters.
In fact, if STRATFOR's report is correct, the United States is holding Russia
directly responsible for Saddam Hussien's future actions. And this should
tell us, at the very least, that Saddam Hussein is a much more terrible threat
than the general public has been led to believe. So terrible is the threat, that
U.S. officials find it necessary to openly threaten Russia in order to
reestablish the balance of terror in the wake of Moscow's secret connivance with
Iraq.
The revelations of yet another respected intelligence firm, DEBKA
File, dovetails with STRATFOR's information. According to DEBKA, the White
House is seriously considering tactical nuclear strikes against Iraq. This
drastic approach can only be explained - once again - by a dire, immediate and
frightening Iraqi potential. If not for this,
U.S. leaders would hardly expend precious political and
diplomatically capital by pushing so aggressively for the eradication
of Saddam's regime in Baghdad. According to intelligence sources close to
DEBKA, [See article.] "The White House is considering the use of tactical
nuclear weapons and planning the break-up of Iraq ; in a broad military campaign
set now for April."
And why the hurry?
Surely, only a very grave threat would inspire such urgency in
U.S. policy-makers. DEBKA confirms that the reason for the U.S.
urgency has to do with Iraq's possession of nuclear warheads, though DEBKA does
not confirm that these are "s-megaton" micro nuclear devices.
Why the U.S. would be concerned with large, more cumbersome and detectable
weapons is a question that readers will have to sort for themselves.
According to DEBKA, the main reason for a nuclear blitzkrieg against Iraq in
April would be to "locate nuclear devices believed to be in the possession
of Saddam Hussein." The idea would then be to destroy the weapons before
they could be used to trigger a nuclear or biological holocaust. Judging
by the tempo of U.S. moves, Iraq's nuclear capability will probably become
effective some time after April 25. That is why, even though U.S.
military authorities confess that we are unready to attack Iraq, an attack must
go forward nonetheless. U.S. officials are also said to be planning
nuclear strikes that would eliminate the top Iraqi leadership, opening the way
for the negotiated surrender of individual Iraqi divisions and the
creation of a Kurdish state in the north.
DEBKA further alleges that Vice President Richard Cheney received intelligence
during his recent Middle East trip that Iraq had already transferred nuclear
weapons to Al Qaeda, along with weaponized smallpox. Cheney was supposedly
told that some of these munitions may have been smuggled into the United States,
Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Many will dismiss the claims of DEBKA, but according to Dr. Robert Morey,
an Islam expert who predicted the Sept. 11 attacks, three small nuclear
devices have been smuggled into the United States and are being held in reserve
for future use. Speaking with the Assist News Service (ANS), Dr. Morey
said: "I have Middle Eastern friends throughout the U.S. who
continually feed me information as to what the terrorists are up to."
[See article.]
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26891
Then comes the most curious and frightening story of them all, which may tie
everything into one neat package. This story comes out of Canada and
involves a U.S. citizen who has been granted political asylum by Ottawa in
accordance with international law. The U.S. citizen in question is Delmart
Edward Vreeland. [See article.]
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thesta
r/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1011567751906&call_page=TS_News
&call_pageid=968332188492&call_pagepath=News/News The United
States government says that Vreeland is a petty criminal. But Vreeland
identifies himself as a lieutenant with the Office of Naval Intelligence who
defected to Canada in December 2000 after retrieving documents from Moscow.
One of these documents, a communiqué from K. Hussaine of Iraq to V.
Putin of Russia, discusses "the initial phase of our planned assault
against the United States in September of 2001 and after." Because of these
shocking revelations, Vreeland maintains that he cannot return to the United
States because the Russian mafia would
assassinate him and because an important American official would
assure Vreeland's death or imprisonment upon his return. The
Russian document, in fact, refers to "our official in America" who can
"assure" the desired results if security should be compromised. The
document does not name the official in question, but Vreeland believes it is
someone with great influence.
I interviewed Mr. Vreeland on Monday and reviewed a key document he allegedly
retrieved from Moscow. The communiqué from K. Hussaine to V. Putin
(referred to above) is dated June 13, 2000, and was used by Vreeland to
successfully predict the Sept. 11 attack in a letter to Canadian prison
authorities. The document, which names the World Trade Center, the
Pentagon and a nuclear power plant as the initial targets of Sept. 11,
curiously describes these as "diversionary strikes" attributed to the
work of "our brothers." The real attack, says the Iraqi official, will
involve the use of "new s-megaton mini satellite [guided] rocket[s]."
This is a weapon that would be smuggled into the United States, and better
resembles a small robot aircraft than a missile. The striking power of
this satellite guided toy rocket is listed as two megatons. The document
says, "The shock wave from the air burst of our two megaton mini combined
with its own reflection from the ground will form a blast wave of such power
that everything will be destroyed . within 8 to 13 U.S. miles of ground
zero." The document also refers to a top secret Russian stealth satellite
termination system (called S.S.S.T.). According to Vreeland, this is a
stealth orbital platform armed with clusters of electromagnetic pulse bombs
capable of knocking out global communications and frying U.S. nuclear
warheads leaving the Western Hemisphere.
If Vreeland's information is reliable, we might have a handle on why
the United States is threatening Russia with nuclear strikes. Like a
trapped animal the U.S. realizes the mistake it has made. Disarming
after our alleged Cold War victory was an error. Now the U.S. must make
terrible threats and take drastic action to restore the nuclear balance.
To do this the United States must hold Russia directly responsible for
Russian-supported and Iraqi-directed nuclear terrorism against the American
homeland. By doing this, and by mopping up Iraq, the United States might
reestablish that same "balance of terror" that kept the peace during
the Cold War.
Readers may ask, "Is red mercury fact or fiction?"
U.S. officials have sometimes ridiculed red mercury as a hoax. But
not former Russian Atomic Energy Minister Viktor Mikhailov, who once spoke of a
new kind of bomb that could devastate "foreign territory" while
carrying no risk of retaliation. During a Pravda interview almost a decade
ago, Mikhailov described the existence of "little bombs" that
"could appear by the year 2000." In 1993 General Y. Negin said that
Russia had developed a special nuclear weapon, "in which a doubling of
yield is achieved with a hundredfold reduction of weight compared to existing
weapons." American scientist Sam Cohen, inventor of the neutron bomb,
pointed out in 1995 that such an increase in nuclear efficiency would only be
possible if the Russians had developed a red mercury device.
Today the Russian Defense Ministry says red mercury doesn't exist. Western
officials treat the subject dismissively. After all, Russian smugglers
have created fake samples of red mercury, which have conveniently fallen into
the hands of Western authorities. But Russian sources, derided as
"questionable," continue to report that red mercury - first produced
in 1965 at a nuclear research center outside Moscow - is currently being
mass-produced at six secret sites in the Urals at a rate of 150 pounds per year.
United States officials would never admit that Russia had developed such a
technology. Such an admission, after a decade of smug denials, would
indicate incompetence and dereliction of duty in high places. It would
indicate that U.S. strategic thinking has been blind, deaf and dumb.
As any nuclear strategist might tell you: the development in Russia of a
micro-nuclear fusion bomb would completely change the
strategic nuclear balance. Undetectable from space, easy to deliver, such
a device could not be tracked or counted by "national technical
means." In addition, it would be the ultimate terrorist weapon.
Did Russia give Iraq red mercury fusion technology?
Last week CIA Director George Tenet pointed his finger directly at
Russia for a reason. The United States now seeks the annihilation of
Saddam Hussein for a reason. Mullah Omar and the killers of Danny Pearl
say that America will soon be gone - perhaps with reason.
WorldNetDaily News Archives: J.R. Nyquist
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=6
Additional info
SADF linked to red mercury
http://www.sn.apc.org/wmail/issues/950120/wm950120-36.html
Red Mercury: Deady New Terrorist Super Weapon
http://members.tripod.com/uforeview/redmercury.